 FA18 ART414
FA18 ART414
ASSESSMENT - Lighting & Sound Design
| I. DEMOGRAPHICS | ||||||||
| 01. | class standing | freshman (0-29 hrs) | sophomore (30-59 hrs) | junior (60-89 hrs) | senior (90-120 hrs) | grad student | other | |
| 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 0% | 0% | 44.4% | 55.6% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 02. | credential sought | associate | bachelor | master | post-master | certificate | other | |
| 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 03. | reason for taking | gen ed | major req | maj/min elective | personal interest | minor req | other | |
| 0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 0% | 55.6% | 22.2% | 22.2% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 04. | overall GPA | ≥ 3.50 | 3.00 - 3.49 | 2.50 - 2.99 | 2.00 - 2.49 | < 2.00 | N/A | |
| 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 55.6% | 11.1% | 33.1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 05. | expected course grade | A | B | C | D | F | other | |
| 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 44.4% | 55.6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 06. | avg hrs of assignment work per week | ≥ 13 | 9 - 12 | 5 - 8 | 1 - 4 | < 1 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 0% | 0% | 55.6% | 44.4% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 07. | mode of delivery | face-to-face | online | ITV | hybrid | lab/studio | intern/field | |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |||
| 55.6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 44.4% | 0% | |||
| II. COURSE GOALS & OBJECTIVES | strongly agree | agree | neutral | disagree | strongly disagree | |||
| 08. | syllabus states how to contact prof | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 77.8% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 0% | 0% | ||||
| 09. | syllabus identifies objectives | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 66.7% | 0% | 22.2% | 0% | 11.1% | ||||
| 10. | syllabus identifies assignments | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 55.6% | 11.1% | 22.2% | 0% | 11.1% | ||||
| 11. | syllabus identifies policies | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 55.6% | 33.3% | 0% | 0% | 11.1% | ||||
| 12. | syllabus identifies grading procedures | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 33.3% | 44.4% | 11.1% | 0% | 11.1% | ||||
| III. PEDAGOGY/OUTCOMES | strongly agree | agree | neutral | disagree | strongly disagree | n/a | ||
| 13. | environment conducive to learning | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 66.7% | 33.3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 14. | assignments contribute to stated objectives | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 66.7% | 22.2% | 11.1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 15. | course is well organized | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 77.8% | 11.1% | 0% | 11.1% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 16. | prof uses time productively | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 33.3% | 55.6% | 0% | 11.1% | 0% | 05 | |||
| 17. | knowledgeable about subject | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 18. | prof answers student questions | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 66.7% | 22.2% | 11.1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 19. | technology supports instruction | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 20. | assignments relevant to course | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 77.8% | 22.2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 21. | prof gives timely feedback | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 55.6% | 33.3% | 11.1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 22. | prof gives meaningful feedback | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 77.8% | 22.2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 23. | prof available outside class | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 88.9% | 11.1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 24. | required textbooks useful | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 22.2% | 22.2% | 44.4% | 0% | 0% | 11.1% | |||
| 25. | content consistent with description | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 77.8% | 0% | 22.2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 26. | improved critical thinking | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 66.7% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 11.1% | 0% | 0% | |||
| 27. | increased subject knowledge | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 77.8% | 22.2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||
| IV. LAB/STUDIO | strongly agree | agree | neutral | disagree | strongly disagree | |||
| 28. | studio reinforces instruction | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 88.9% | 11.1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||
| 29. | prof demos skills & techniques | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 77.8% | 22.2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||
| 30. | instructor available during studio | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | ||||
